in the interests of honesty

I really wanted to show you my hot pink, pointy-toed Fluevogs with the white stitching and the kitten heel, but we’ll save those for later. It’s sunny today, and time to be honest about what gets me through most summer days. Here they are in all their non-fashionable glory, my standby Birkenstocks. Wait, wait, before you leave the site in disgust, note the clean lines, the metallic silver . . .

no, really, check out how they show off a pedicure

oh dear, you’re not at all convinced and I’m sounding a bit shrill, no? Well, at least they’re not Crocs and besides, look how far I’ve come — here are my old Birkenstocks, the oh-so-fashionable Papillio model with the double straps across the instep and the strap around the back for extra clunkiness! Looking every minute of their 20-year life (they’ve been re-soled once), these do very well on the cost-per-wearing test but not so much for their allure.

The (relatively) new pair, the sleek metallic ones, I got three years ago, before we went to Paris. I consulted with a young and fashionable friend who lived there (hello, Andrea!), wondering what would be the best option considering how much Paul and I tend to walk. We didn’t want to clunk around in Nike runners, but neither did we want to curtail our activities over my sore feet. She said that the newer, sexier (I know, but stretch yourselves!) Birks were a regular and acceptable sight on the sidewalks of Paris and we’ve found this to be true, having logged 15 to 20 kilometres a day on each of our last three weeklong visits there. I alternate them with a pair of Diesel sneakers and then if we have a lighter walking day, I’ll wear a shoe with a small heel (like the tan leather onesI showed you three weeks ago or the white-and-denim slingbacksfrom last week). And I generally have a pair of heels that I can walk a kilometre or two for dinner in the evening. I do make sure to keep the rest of my attire as smart as I can to offset any possible sloppiness that might be associated with a Birkenstock and I have been asked, in French, for directions, by French pedestrians, so I tell myself that perhaps I don’t stick out as “the (fashion)-ugly Canadian.”

Back in my small island city, of course, these only stick out as being more structured than the ubiquitous flip-flop and a lighter, cleaner look than that other ubiquitous horror, the Croc. In Vancouver, where we also walk long long distances, I don’t feel embarrassed to walk along Robson or even into Holt Renfrew, but we Vancouverites are very tolerant. (Although I think my older Birks would be pushing it!)

What do you think? Do you have a similar summer workhorse shoe? Something you can pack to go with a dress or with jeans that will look reasonably fashionable and still let you walk? Do you prefer to suffer for style? Or do you think that comfort beats all other considerations? And, dare I ask, do you think I’m just fooling myself about the good looks of these silver Birks?

2 Comments

  1. Bronwen
    24 August 2007 / 5:41 am

    I luuuuv my new birks – the ones like yours – they are super comfortable and I think a fairly stylish option for doing lots of walking during the summer. especially in a metallic! also love my diesel sneaks. jeez, who’s copying who here?

  2. materfamilias
    24 August 2007 / 6:10 am

    The fact that you and Meg also have these sandals makes me think they’ve gotta rate! But as for who’s copying who, well, let’s see, I got my Birks 3 years ago and you got yours this summer. And I’ve had my Diesels for 5 years now! So . . .
    But at least you’re copying from a good source!

Copyright

Unless otherwise stated, all words and photographs in this blog are my own. If you wish to use any of them, please give me credit for my work. And it should go without saying, but apparently needs to be said: Do not publish entire posts as your own. I will take the necessary action to stop such theft. Thanks.